OLD COURT CASES 1602s and ITPs

 

 

OLD 1602 LAWSUIT (CFBF) DROPPED

rdbut.jpg (1118 bytes)California Farm Bureau January 11 CFBF letter on 1602s; Siskiyou County Farm Bureau (facebook): Follow Farm Bureau's efforts in regards to the 1602 "under which the Department of Fish Game (DFG) appears to be proposing to treat all agricultural diversions of water as falling within the jurisdiction of the streambed alteration statutes" CFBF 2 irrigator form letters to respond to CDFG

Lawsuit Against ITP: Suit seeks to block state plan for water use on north state rivers; and Coalition Challenges State’s “Licenses to Kill Salmon” on Key Klamath River Streams

Farm Bureau Lawsuit against 1602 requirements: Farm Bureau sues fishery agency over water rights enforcement;

Pacific Legal (Siskiyou County and California Cattlemen's Assoc): State Review Not Required for Routine Exercise of Valid Water Rights

new.gif (26402 bytes)Nielsen & LaMalfa Demand Fish and Game Department stop harassing property owners/water users

 

 

 

OLD COHO PROGRAMMATIC ITP & 1602
SHOT DOWN BY COURT

 

new.gif (26402 bytes)Tentative decision in Riverkeeper et al v CA DFG

rdbar.jpg (10843 bytes)

rdbut.jpg (1118 bytes)Siskiyou RCD (Resource Conservation District

rdbut.jpg (1118 bytes)Shasta Valley RCD

rdbut.jpg (1118 bytes)Comments:

rdbut.jpg (1118 bytes)Department of Fish and Game letter to diverters

rdbut.jpg (1118 bytes)"Fact Sheet" Regarding Incidental Take Permitting and Streambed Alteration Agreement Requirements for Agricultural Diversions in the Shasta and Scott River Watersheds