marcia8.jpg.jpg (10768 bytes) Ridin' Point

- a weekly column published in the Pioneer Press

Constituents in my district have always said that their biggest concerns are jobs and the economy. For five years I have served on the Board of the Siskiyou County Economic Development Council (EDC.) I am excited to say that we are now on the verge of some great opportunities. Recently, we submitted a countywide application for the California Enterprise Zone Program. The application included every city in the county, as well as commercially zoned parts of unincorporated areas such as Happy Camp. Such a large scale geographic proposal was previously unheard of, however, because every area of the county qualified as disadvantaged, a team effort was made to expand from the expiring Shasta Valley Zone to include the entire county.

Enterprise Zones (EZs) provide state and local incentives to promote business investment and job creation. The designation will last for 15 years and provide businesses located in the EZ with such benefits as: $37,440 or more in state tax credits for each qualified employee hired; corporate sales tax credits on purchases of $20 million per year of qualified machinery and machinery parts; up-front expensing of certain depreciable property; the ability to apply unused tax credits to future tax years, stretching out the benefit of the initial investment; the ability to earn preference points on state contracts; up to 100% Net Operating Loss (NOL) carry-forward. (NOL may be carried forward 15 years.) In addition, lenders to Zone businesses may receive a net interest deduction.

Now is the time for the people of Siskiyou County to get onboard a unified push to diversify and stimulate our economy, to create jobs for our people and to become more business friendly. Siskiyou County has stepped forward under its new Public Health and Community Development Department to consolidate permit services under one director. A one stop permit center is under development oriented toward customer convenience and service.

People are our biggest asset. CalEd has an Economic Development Leadership Forum. Perhaps it is a good time to train our local leaders to become more business savvy.  http://www.caled.org Our local schools could also take the opportunity to emphasize business 101 in our schools. JEDI (Jefferson Economic Development Institute) has a number of classes and programs for entrepreneurs and start-ups. http://www.e-jedi.org/programs.html Check out the College of the Siskiyous Course Catalogue for classes at http://www.siskiyous.edu/ There are several certificates in skill specialties offered. Workforce Connection also provides services for job seekers and employers http://www.siskiyouwc.org/home.html Also, sometimes there are various offerings on customer service geared toward the tourism industry.

At the same time, communities must examine the cost to the well-being of its families that comes from NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) opposition to business and come to some agreement about their futures. Essential services cannot be sustained without a viable economy and the state is quick to target rural areas for program cuts. Economic stressors increase substance abuse, domestic violence and child abuse. With Ford Family Foundation and Leadership Siskiyou trained community members, the opportunity is ripe to move forward to claim a healthy economy at the grass roots level.   

The Siskiyou County EDC has a wonderful new search engine for locating commercial and industrial properties for development. http://www.siskiyoucounty.org/gis.aspx The EDC, located in Yreka, has business incubator facilities and support services. In addition, the Pacific West Food Works facilities include a large shared-use commercial kitchen and support services for entrepreneurs with dreams of a business in the gourmet or food products market.  http://www.pacificwestfoodworks.com/

Part of attracting and retaining businesses to the county is developing the capacity of the infrastructure to accommodate them. This includes such things as water supply, sewer and wastewater treatment, storm drainage, electricity, gas/propane, streets, lighting and transportation. Several studies have been done of water/sewer capacity. Assessment of these needs is taking shape and there are efforts to make a concerted effort to aggressively pursue available grant opportunities to improve capacity.

Unfortunately, at the same time, the County is faced with efforts to undermine its assets. Loss of the federal Secure Schools and Communities Self Determination Act funds that replaced lost timber receipts, (due to a decrease in timber harvesting on federal lands,) has taken away $4.5 million in county road maintenance funding. Now, the threatened loss of rail service to the County could remove a cost effective mode of transportation for future and existing businesses such as Timber Products, Roseburg Forest Products and Crystal Geyser. At the same time, the astronomical cost of hydropower dam removal on the Klamath or the artificially inflated requirements to keep the dams in operation will fall directly on the shoulders of the few California and Southern Oregon rate payers. Relatively inexpensive commercial electricity – once considered an asset to businesses in Siskiyou County, could become an expensive liability if FERC relicensing requirements continue to proceed in the direction many, including the state and federal agencies, are pushing for.       

 

 

Siskiyou Enterprise Zone must meet at least three or more of the following distress criteria:

· The net increase in per capita income between 1990 and 2004 was 80 percent or less of the statewide average;

· The average rate of unemployment for both 2003 and 2004 was in excess of 7.4 percent;

· The percentage of persons below the poverty level in 2000 was in excess of 15.2 percent;

· At least 70 percent of households had incomes below 80 percent of median county family income in 2000.

 

Census Tract Number

Net Increase in Per Capita Income

Average Rate of Unemploy-ment

Percentage of Persons Below Poverty Level

Percentage of Households Below Median County Family Income

Declared Disaster Area

(Date)

Meets at least 3 of 5 Distress Criteria?

Census Tract 1

29.7%

9.5 %

32.0 %

54.5 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 2

61.6%

9.5 %

21.9 %

58.0 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 3

75.0%

9.5 %

16.8 %

53.3 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 4

21.9%

9.5 %

16.5 %

55.4 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 5

53.7%

9.5 %

23.7 %

60.2 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 6

115.8%

9.5 %

17.0 %

49.5 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 7.02

54.5%

7.9 %

31.1 %

65.2 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 7.03, BG 1

91.0%

7.9 %

18.1 %

55.7 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 9

98.7%

18.5 %

18.0 %

47.4 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 10, BG 4

57.4%

9.5 %

16.2 %

45.4 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 11

90.1%

11.5 %

18.1 %

59.6 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 12

93.1%

12.4 %

18.0 %

48.9 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES*

Census Tract 7.01, BG 4

64.6%

9.5 %

20.6 %

43.4 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES

Census Tract 7.03, BG 2

107.0%

7.9 %

16.8 %

40.6 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES

Census Tract 8, BG 2

75.3%

9.5 %

18.0 %

56.0 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES

Census Tract 10, BG 5

39.9%

9.5 %

12.6 %

37.1 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

YES

Census Tract 7.01, BG 1

138.2%

9.5 %

9.9 %

33.8 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

NO

Census Tract 7.01, BG 2

141.3%

9.5 %

7.6 %

29.9 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

NO

Census Tract 7.01, BG 3

167.1%

9.5 %

13.7 %

36.7 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

NO

Census Tract 7.03, BG 3

93.4%

7.9 %

7.0 %

29.9 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

NO

Census Tract 8, BG 1

137.8%

9.5 %

12.3 %

44.1 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

NO

Census Tract 8, BG 3

221.2%

9.5 %

13.7 %

44.9 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

NO

Census Tract 10, BG 1

129.9%

5.5 %

29.4 %

68.8 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

NO

Census Tract 10, BG 2

96.1%

5.5 %

19.6 %

55.1 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

NO

Census Tract 10, BG 3

190.8%

5.5 %

13.5 %

37.0 %

Yes (Feb 3, 2006)

NO

homebutn.jpg (7555 bytes)