The incredible stretching Endangered Species Act:
Is the Endangered Species Act being used to protect true declining native species or to
exert power and control over privately owned natural resources?
Coho
salmon: Regardless of whether you believe coho salmon is native to the Klamath River
system, there is a real question as to whether today’s coho are native salmon. Figure 2 from NOAA Technical
Memorandum 17, (Application of DNA Technology to the management of Pacific Salmon,)
indicates that Klamath River Iron Gate Hatchery stocks are genetically related to coho of
the South Puget Sound, North Oregon and Washington Coast cluster. Iron Gate Hatchery
(IGH) coho were determined to be of an entirely different genetic cluster than the Rogue
River and Cowlitz coho, which are in
the Southern Oregon Northern California Coho unit. http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/publications/techmemos/tm17/figures/bermfig2.htm
This is actually consistent with the history of artificial coho plantings in the
Klamath system which are mentioned in Chapter 5 of the Klamath
River Basin Fisheries Task Force Long Range Plan (LRP) and Appendix D of the 2002 state
listing analysis done by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game: Historical Occurrence of Coho
Salmon in the Upper Klamath, Shasta and Scott Rivers.
http://users.sisqtel.net/armstrng/native%20Klamath%20coho.htm
A 1994 report called the “Historic
Decline and Current Status of Coho Salmon in California” stated:
"Like the Iron Gate stock, the Trinity River stock is primarily of nonnative
origin. The first significant planting was of Eel River stock in 1964, followed by Cascade
River (Oregon) stocks in 1966, 1967, and 1970. Noyo River (California) stock was planted
along with Cascade River fish in 1970, and Alsea River (Oregon) stock was planted along
with Cascade River fish in 1970…"
These non-native fish were widely outplanted in our tributaries...According to the LRP:
"From 1979 to 1988 the average number of coho juveniles planted was 670,531 annually.
Plants ranged from a high of 1,198,696 in 1981 to a low of 156,150 in 1984..."
Proposed
Listing of the Gray Wolf: On another front, the federal government has listed the gray
or “timber” wolf (Canis lupus) as an endangered species and the State of California is in the process
of considering it for state listing. Keep in mind that there was a museum search in CA for
specimens in 1916 and only two were located. Most of the specimens brought in turned out
to be large mountain coyotes. Although early explorers and settlers recorded seeing
wolves, it is not clear whether these were actually wolves or the large coyotes that live
in our mountains (canis latrans lestes.)
In 1922, a wolf was collected from San Bernardino County. It is likely from the description that that this was a Mexican wolf (Canis
baileyi.) The only other wolf specimen collected was in Lassen County in 1924. The two specimen’s that were located were both under 100 pounds
in size. The
Lassen wolf is the last known wild wolf ever trapped in California, except for an adult
male weighing 56 pounds trapped in Tulare County in 1962. (This was assumed to be an
introduced wolf of Southeast Asian origin.) Nevertheless, a CA Dept of Fish and Game (DFG)
report concludes that: “wolves were not abundant, even though they were widely
distributed, in California. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/wolf/docs/Gray_Wolf_Report_2012.pdf
So the question arises what is the origin
of the wolves coming into California that the federal government and the DFG wants to
protect as endangered? In 1995-96, sixty eight Mackenzie Valley wolves captured in Alberta,
Canada were released in Yellowstone. Historically, the native male wolf (Canis lupus
irremotus) of the Northern Rockies averaged around 90 to 95 pounds at maturity. These
native wolves ranged about 100 square miles, hunting alone or in small packs of four-five
at the most. Small pockets of this native species still existed in the Rockies when the Alberta
strain was introduced. Mature males of the Alberta Canada sub-species often top 140-150
plus pounds, typically hunt 300 or more square miles, with packs often numbering 20 or
more.
The total population of wolves in Canada exceeds 50,000, with a large
percentage if these consisting of the Alberta sub-species Canis lupus occidentalis. They
are not endangered and they are not native. This Canadian subspecies is the gray wolf the
federal government has protected as endangered and the one California is currently
considering for Endangered Species Act protection.
Social and Economic Impact
Spotted Owl Critical Habitat: On behalf of the western counties, a detailed comment
has been submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the social and economic
impact of the proposed expansion of critical habitat for the Northern Spotted Owl. Siskiyou
County is featured. Please note, the comment is 0 large but can be downloaded here: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/30650836/Sierra%20Instsitute%20Comments%20Final%20Report%208-20-12.pdf
|
